Have you been injured? you may have a case. GET A FREE CONSULTATION

McCormick v. Carrier and its effect on auto accident victims and insurance rates in Michigan

August 3, 2010 by Steven M. Gursten

Personal injury attorney Steve Gursten tells the Lansing State Journal that auto insurance rates should not rise following the landmark Michigan Supreme Court decision

McCormick v. Carrier is an August 2010 Michigan Supreme Court case that eases the injury threshold for people hurt in car accidents and seeking pain and suffering lawsuits. Personal injury attorney Steve Gursten tells the Lansing State Journal that this new law only restores the rights of auto accident victims – which were ravaged by Michigan’s previous and very harsh auto law, Kreiner v. Fischer.

Meanwhile, auto insurance companies in Michigan are threatening to raise insurance rates due to McCormick. Gursten challenges the insurance industry’s claim, arguing that auto insurance rates have increased despite Kreiner v. Fischer – while the average number of annual claims by motorists has dropped by more than 50 percent.

Take a look at the full story in the Lansing State Journal: Michigan court sets new standard in injury lawsuits: 2004 decision in compensation case tossed out


Related information:

Why the insurance industry thinks Michigan drivers are really dumb

McCormick v. Carrier and your auto case

[Community Guidelines]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Michigan Auto Law 2023 Year in Review
Michigan Auto Law’s 2023 Year In Review
December 22, 2023
Michigan car accident settlement stories
Michigan Car Accident Settlement Stories: Client Successes & Settlement Amounts
August 30, 2023
Michigan Auto Law Attorneys Voted Best Lawyers 2024 and Super Lawyers 2023
Michigan Auto Law attorneys voted Super Lawyers 2023 and Best Lawyers in America 2024
August 25, 2023