Mlive.com: What does Michigan’s new auto law mean for car accident victims?

Auto accident lawyer says under McCormick v. Carrier, personal injuries now do not have to be life-long in order to bring pain and suffering lawsuits

MLive.com interviews Steve Gursten, one of the counry’s top auto accident lawyers, on McCormick v. Carrier. McCormick is a August, 2010 Michigan Supreme Court decision that overturned Kreiner v. Fischer, Michigan’s previous auto law that made it virtually impossible for auto accident victims to collect pain and suffering damages for serious injuries.

Gursten told Mlive.com that while McCormick will make it easier for plaintiffs to garner awards for pain and suffering, the exact level has not been determined. The court determined it will be on a “case by case basis, and the definition will narrow as cases are decided, he said.

Take a look at the full story in Mlive: Michigan court sets new standard in injury lawsuits

 

Related information:

Pain and suffering

Understanding Kreiner v. Fischer

Legally Reviewed By
Published: Aug 2, 2010 | Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Written By

Steve M. Gursten, Attorney,
License#: P53632

Steven Gursten, attorney at Michigan Auto Law and one of the most successful auto accident attorneys in Michigan. Michigan Auto Law represents people seriously injured in car, truck, motorcycle, and bus accidents, including catastrophic injury, traumatic brain injury, and No-Fault insurance cases. Steven has recovered the largest reported auto and truck accident settlement of any Michigan lawyer, and has been named Michigan Lawyer of the Year and a Top 50 Michigan Super Lawyer.

Read Steven Gursten’s full attorney profile

Legally Reviewed by Todd Berg, Attorney

Steve M. Gursten, Attorney

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. See our Community Guidelines.