Have you been injured? you may have a case. GET A FREE CONSULTATION

Michigan auto accident victims didn’t meet serious impairment threshold in Kreiner v. Fischer

June 2, 2004 by Steven M. Gursten

Personal injury lawyer discusses the effect Kreiner will have on plaintiff auto accident victims

Steve Gursten of Michigan Auto Law is interviewed by Michigan Lawyers Weekly after the Michigan Supreme Court decision Kreiner v. FischerKreiner interpreted the No-Fault Act’s “serious impairment of body function” statute, establishing the precondition plaintiffs must meet before they can sue for non-economic damages in such a way that many people who suffered serious personal injuries and who missed months from work, had virtually zero rights.

Gursten said he was concerned with the fact that a one-vote majority in the Michigan Supreme Court made such a radical change to a clear, legislative definition of serious impairment of body function.

Here’s the Michigan Lawyers Weekly story: Accident victims didn’t meet serious impairment threshold in Kreiner v. Fischer

Update: The Michigan Supreme Court ruled on McCormick v. Carrier on August 1, 2010. This overturned Kreiner v. Fischer and restored the rights of auto accident victims in Michigan.

Related information:

McCormick v. Carrier and its effect on Michigan auto law requirements

Serious impairment of body function

[Community Guidelines]

Related Posts
Attorney Kevin Seiferheld speaks on Advanced Trial Advocacy at Michigan Association for Justice seminar
May 17, 2019
Attorney Brandon Hewitt talks about distracted driving with WZZM 13 Grand Rapids
May 13, 2019
Michigan Car Insurance Rates: Attorney Brandon Hewitt Talks About The Non-Driving Factors Affecting Them
May 10, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share
Pin
Email