Have you been injured? you may have a case. GET A FREE CONSULTATION

Michigan auto accident victims didn’t meet serious impairment threshold in Kreiner v. Fischer

June 2, 2004 by Steven M. Gursten

Personal injury lawyer discusses the effect Kreiner will have on plaintiff auto accident victims

Steve Gursten of Michigan Auto Law is interviewed by Michigan Lawyers Weekly after the Michigan Supreme Court decision Kreiner v. FischerKreiner interpreted the No-Fault Act’s “serious impairment of body function” statute, establishing the precondition plaintiffs must meet before they can sue for non-economic damages in such a way that many people who suffered serious personal injuries and who missed months from work, had virtually zero rights.

Gursten said he was concerned with the fact that a one-vote majority in the Michigan Supreme Court made such a radical change to a clear, legislative definition of serious impairment of body function.

Here’s the Michigan Lawyers Weekly story: Accident victims didn’t meet serious impairment threshold in Kreiner v. Fischer

Update: The Michigan Supreme Court ruled on McCormick v. Carrier on August 1, 2010. This overturned Kreiner v. Fischer and restored the rights of auto accident victims in Michigan.

Related information:

McCormick v. Carrier and its effect on Michigan auto law requirements

Serious impairment of body function

[Community Guidelines]

Related Posts
Super Lawyers 2019 & Best Lawyers in America 2020 Lists Revealed
Michigan Auto Law attorneys selected for the Super Lawyers 2019 and Best Lawyers in America 2020© listings
September 4, 2019
Helen Zhou Wins Michigan Auto Law’s 2019 Law Student Diversity Scholarship
Recipient announced for the Michigan Auto Law 2019 Law Student Diversity Scholarship
August 22, 2019
Attorney Steve Gursten To Lead Two National Legal Groups
Attorney Steven Gursten to Lead Two Legal Groups: The Melvin M. Belli Society & AAJ Distracted Driving Litigation Group
August 12, 2019
Michigan has a new auto No-Fault law. Click Here to learn more.