About Alexus Ringstad
Legal experience
Alexus began at Michigan Auto Law as a law clerk. During law school, she was a team leader and competitor for Wayne State Law School’s American Association for Justice National Mock Trial Team.
She recently assisted with a Macomb County car accident case that resulted in a $3.5 million settlement. The case involved a car accident victim who sustained severe brain injuries.
Education
Wayne State Law School, Juris Doctor – Detroit, MI
- Moot Court Board Member, Chief Financial Officer
- Moot Court Oral Argument Competitor: Jerome Prince Memorial Evidence Competition, Brooklyn, NY
- Team Leader and Competitor: AAJ National Mock Trial Team
Grand Valley State University, Bachelor of Business Administration – Allendale, MI
- Dean’s List
- Graduated with Honors
Memberships and Affiliations
- Michigan Association for Justice
- American Association for Justice
Licenses
- Michigan
- Federal Eastern District
- Federal Western District
Client Testimonials
★★★★★
gjelosh camaj
To Michigan auto law Thank you so much for helping us and we had the best attorney Alexus Ringstad help all the way by put side every step thank you Alexus you are like family You help us to understand all the way we appreciate Very much Thank you Camaj family
★★★★★
Tracy Yates from Chesaning
I have had a great experience overall with Michigan Auto Law. I would highly recomend them to assess your case and carry over your worries and troubles with dealing with insurance companies who tend to not pay when your entitled to it. Please go through Thomas James, or Alex Kemp, Alexus Ringstad for attorneys, very passionate and considerate of their clients situations and or health related to the accident. Also, highly recommend Michele Gerkin, their paralegal. Thank you Michigan Auto Law for all that you do and the courtesy follow up calls when called for questions and concerns.
1 Review
Powered by ReviewInc
Disclosure
The reviews displayed may or may not be a complete set. Reviews may be removed if they:
i. Are abusive. An abusive review or comment is one that makes personal attacks, threatens, or harasses others, or uses profanity.
ii. Violate privacy. Reviews that mention specific names of individuals or personal information in a manner that is inappropriate and/or unrelated to the performance of the service rendered are subject to removal.
iii. Are not from a current customer.
iv. Contain material falsehoods.
v. Are deemed inappropriate.
To encourage all feedback, positive or otherwise, an equal incentive for reviews, regardless of rating, may have been provided to the reviewer.
Google reviews provided via APIs https://www.google.com/+/policy/embedded-content.html
