April 17, 2018
If judges want to just completely ignore the law, then we have no law. Zichichi case contradicts existing No Fault threshold case law and requirements from McCormick v. Carrier in favor of radical new ‘judge made law’
Tag: pain and suffering
Tag Cloud
Allstate
American Association for Justice
Attendant Care
Attorney Alison Duffy
Attorney Brandon Hewitt
Attorney Jordan Jones
Attorney Josh Terebelo
Attorney Kevin Seiferheld
Attorney Larry Gursten
Attorney Lenny Koltonow
Attorney Robert Raitt
Attorney Steven Gursten
Attorney Thomas James
Attorney Todd Berg
Bahri v. IDS
Best Lawyers
car accident lawsuit
Car Accident Settlements and Verdicts
car insurance premiums
concussion
Crain's Detroit Business
D-Insurance
drugged driving
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Fox 2 Detroit
independent medical exam
Injury Advocate Blog
Kreiner v Fischer
McCormick v. Carrier
Michigan Association for Justice
Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association
Michigan Court of Appeals
Michigan Lawyers Weekly
Michigan motorcycle helmet law
Michigan No Fault Benefits
Michigan No Fault fraud
Michigan No Fault Insurance
Michigan speed limit law
Michigan Supreme Court
No-Fault Insurance Blog
No-Fault wage loss
State Farm insurance
Super Lawyers
truck accident lawsuit
Truck Accident Settlements and Verdicts
Read this post
April 13, 2018
Court rules that award of SSD benefits 20 years prior to crash doesn’t stop a car accident lawsuit from being filed for injury victim; SSD benefits awarded on different basis than claim from auto accident
June 14, 2017
Court rules Oakland County auto accident lawsuit can go forward based on cervical and lumbar MRI evidence & accident victim’s ‘more sedentary’ post-crash life
June 2, 2017
Unlike with auto No-Fault, health insurance companies could take away a car crash victim’s right to see the doctor of her choice and claw back pain and suffering compensation through liens
March 6, 2017
The ‘Protecting Access to Care Act of 2017’ is all about shielding negligent doctors, negligent hospitals and negligent medical providers from being held fully liable for the harms they’ve caused — at the expense of those they have harmed
October 29, 2015
When judges don’t follow the law, auto accident victims are denied justice: Appellate court rules jury should hear auto accident victims’ pain and suffering lawsuit after trial judge ‘mistakenly focused’ on wrong legal standard How can Michigan auto accident victims get justice if trial judges don’t – or won’t – follow the correct law and …
Continue reading “What’s the legal standard for pain and suffering?”
October 10, 2014
Court affirms verdict for auto accident victim who suffered ‘bodily injury’ and sued under Michigan’s motor vehicle exception to governmental immunity Tension over what the words “bodily injury” mean continues to build as I write these words. Michigan lawyers are waiting for the Supreme Court to weigh in on the issue of governmental immunity and …
August 2, 2010
Top auto lawyer tells network that McCormick v. Carrier eases the serious impairment threshold that must be met to pursue an injury lawsuit CNBC covers the Michigan Supreme Court decision McCormick v. Carrier and what it means to auto accident victims in Michigan. The court in a 4-3 decision, said conservative justices in the majority six years …
Continue reading “CNBC: Michigan Supreme Court ruling gives second chance to auto accident victims”
Auto accident lawyer says under McCormick v. Carrier, personal injuries now do not have to be life-long in order to bring pain and suffering lawsuits MLive.com interviews Steve Gursten, one of the counry’s top auto accident lawyers, on McCormick v. Carrier. McCormick is a August, 2010 Michigan Supreme Court decision that overturned Kreiner v. Fischer, Michigan’s previous auto law …
Continue reading “Mlive.com: What does Michigan’s new auto law mean for car accident victims?”