Tag: Bahri v. IDS

October 21, 2017

Jordan Jones, a Michigan Auto Law attorney, serves as a plaintiffs’ lawyer No Fault expert for ICLE program on 2017’s No Fault law decisions

Read this post
August 23, 2017

Lawyers who process clients’ attendant care claims MUST fact-check before submitting No-Fault forms to insurers, who are only too eager to allege fraud over the most innocent of mistakes

Read this post
August 22, 2017

Court rules that No-Fault fraud involving a claim for benefits under the Michigan Assigned Claims Plan requires knowledge and intent to defraud and deceive

Read this post
August 3, 2017

Pro-insurance rulings, misuse and abuse of No-Fault system by insurers, defense lawyers and adjusters, politicians’ pro-insurance, anti-consumer ‘reform’ plans threaten to gut of the best insurance system in the nation

Read this post
June 19, 2017

Car crash victim didn’t commit No-Fault fraud based on alleged “discrepancies” from surveillance evidence

Read this post
May 30, 2017

Crooked IME doctors, bad faith litigation policies and insurance-friendly double-standards from our courts have emboldened auto insurers to step-up denials and illegal cut-offs without cause

Read this post
April 28, 2017

Robert Raitt will speak at ICLE’s annual No-Fault Summit about common pitfalls from the plaintiff’s perspective when adjusting a No-Fault PIP claim

Read this post
April 26, 2017

The ‘Bahri’ decision is scaring doctors from treating car crash victims and their injuries. A real fix can only come from the Michigan Legislature

Read this post
April 25, 2017

Mistakes, ‘inconsistent’ or ‘erroneous’ statements not enough to show ‘fraudulent intent’ in claims for replacement services, wage loss benefits under No-Fault

Read this post