Have you been injured? you may have a case. GET A FREE CONSULTATION

Consequences of eliminating mandatory No-Fault insurance

September 7, 2011 by Steven M. Gursten

Insurance lawyer is on Michigan Radio, explains how insurance companies are the only ones who benefit from proposed changes to Michigan No-Fault law

Steven M. Gursten was interviewed as an insurance lawyer source for a Michigan Radio story – on what would really happen if legislators go through with proposed changes to the Michigan No-Fault law.

Michigan Radio is an FM radio station, and Gursten was featured on Michigan Watch, an investigative show.

Gursten told the host, Lester Graham,  that these proposed insurance bills would cap medical expenses for auto accident victims to a dangerously low amount — not nearly enough to pull through lifelong injuries like traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury.

He also stressed that if the Michigan Legislature really wants to lower insurance rates, there’s a smarter way to do it:  Limit the insurance companies’ profits.

Here’s the full story: Consequences of eliminating mandatory No-Fault auto insurance

 

Related information:

Michigan No-Fault insurance resource center

Your Michigan No-Fault benefits

[Community Guidelines]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
New No-Fault Reimbursement Rates Pulled Out of Thin Air
New No-Fault Reimbursement Rates Pulled Out of Thin Air
June 10, 2021
How To Save On Car Insurance After Michigan No-Fault Reform
How To Save On Car Insurance After Michigan No-Fault Reform
May 27, 2021
Gursten v Doe: Court Allows Fake Online Google My Business Reviews to Harm Competition
Gursten v Doe: Court Allows Fake Online Google My Business Reviews to Harm Competition
March 29, 2021
Share
Tweet
Share
Pin
Email