Have you been injured? you may have a case.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
GET A FREE CONSULTATION

Consequences of eliminating mandatory No-Fault insurance

September 7, 2011 by Steven M. Gursten

Insurance lawyer is on Michigan Radio, explains how insurance companies are the only ones who benefit from proposed changes to Michigan No-Fault law

Steven M. Gursten was interviewed as an insurance lawyer source for a Michigan Radio story – on what would really happen if legislators go through with proposed changes to the Michigan No-Fault law.

Michigan Radio is an FM radio station, and Gursten was featured on Michigan Watch, an investigative show.

Gursten told the host, Lester Graham,  that these proposed insurance bills would cap medical expenses for auto accident victims to a dangerously low amount — not nearly enough to pull through lifelong injuries like traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury.

He also stressed that if the Michigan Legislature really wants to lower insurance rates, there’s a smarter way to do it:  Limit the insurance companies’ profits.

Here’s the full story: Consequences of eliminating mandatory No-Fault auto insurance

 

Related information:

Michigan No-Fault insurance resource center

Your Michigan No-Fault benefits

[Community Guidelines]

Need more information?
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Related Posts
Senate Bill 1 - Politicians grandstanding about No-Fault reform
Senate Bill 1: All talk on auto No-Fault
January 17, 2019
No-Fault reform - House bill will cap benefits
House Bill 4024 eliminates No-Fault benefits
January 14, 2019
No-Fault bill in lame duck session
Last-minute No-Fault bill waddles into legislative lame duck session
December 18, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share
Email