Have you been injured? you may have a case. GET A FREE CONSULTATION

Allstate’ sin No. 2: Targeting auto accident victims who had “audacity” to hire an attorney

July 14, 2011 by Steven M. Gursten

Michigan auto attorneys explain how Allstate tried to punish people for hiring lawyers to sue for their injuries and protect their No-Fault insurance benefits

Last week, I wrote about Allstate’s first “sin,” using Colossus software to reduce payouts to injured auto accident victims. Today let’s talk about Allstate’s sin No. 2, targeting car accident victims over the past decade who hired auto attorneys, and trying to low-ball their injury settlements.

This is part of a series I’m writing on all the reasons I can think of as to why Allstate has started its “claims satisfaction guarantee.” Funny (not “funny” ha-ha, more “funny” ironic) how Allstate can guarantee anything now, after just agreeing to pay a very large settlement to states for its claims handling and mistreatment of injury victims and customers.

Here’s how Allstate’s second of many wrongdoings began … Allstate figured out that when injured car accident victims hired auto attorneys to protect them and their rights, Allstate ends up paying more on those victims’ No-Fault insurance claims. Accordingly, Allstate deduced that the best way to keep payouts down was to discourage accident victims from hiring attorneys.

Incidentally, the insurance industry now estimates they pay 4 times more on average when injured people hire auto attorneys. This explains the new push by many insurance companies, including Allstate, to try to contact and settle directly with accident victims shortly after a crash.

Allstate pursued their strategy to discourage people from hiring auto attorneys in two ways:

1. First, there was the so-called “good hands” approach for injured victims who did not hire attorneys. Their claims were settled relatively swiftly, albeit for low-ball settlement amounts likely dictated by Allstate’s Colossus computer program. (BusinessWeek, “In Tough Hands at Allstate,” May 1, 2006)

2. Second, there was the “boxing gloves” approach for car accident victims who dared to hire auto attorneys. They “face battering in the courts and potentially years of delay.” (BusinessWeek, “In Tough Hands at Allstate,” May 1, 2006) The point of the strategy was: “‘It forces the claimant and attorney to think about the obstacles they must overcome to recover a significant settlement or the benefits of a smaller walk away settlement.'” (Herald Tribune, “How a get-tough policy lifted Allstate’s profits,” April 6, 2008)

Doesn’t sound like the “good hands” people to me.

Next week, I’ll blog about Allstate’ sin No. 3 and No. 4: Targeting and trying to run medical care providers out of business who actually treat the injured and don’t do what Allstate wants, and alleging “irregularities” to refuse payment of benefits.

Steven Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top attorneys handling serious auto accident cases and insurance litigation. He writes about insurance company abuse and the Michigan No-Fault insurance laws, and is available for comment.

– This blog was written by Steven Gursten and Todd Berg, esq.

Related information:

Top 6 worst auto insurance companies

4 best auto insurance companies

Important car insurance coverage issues

Michigan Auto Law is the largest law firm exclusively handling car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state. We have offices in Farmington Hills, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. Call (248) 353-7575 for a free consultation with one of our auto attorneys.

[Community Guidelines]

2 Replies to “Allstate’ sin No. 2: Targeting auto accident victims who had “audacity” to hire an attorney”

  1. Insurance companies have all kinds of “tricks” to save a buck. I advise all of my patients to at least talk with an attorney before if they have been in an accident.

  2. The harm people do to themselves by not talking, for free and no obligation, with a lawyer who can at least take a few minutes to inform them of their rights under our law always continues to amaze me. It also leads to horrible examples of people being taken terribly advantage of . For example, read here how one insurance adjuster didn’t tell the insured about the availability of attendant care for a brain injured baby: Why your insurance company can lie to you and legally get away with it https://www.michiganautolaw.com/auto-lawyers-blog/2009/05/28/why-your-insurance-company-can-now-lie-to-you-%E2%80%93-and-legally-get-away-with-it/.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Beware the $10,000 PIP medical car insurance deductible
$10,000 Michigan PIP Medical Car insurance Deductible: Beware
May 8, 2023
Auto Insurance Company Profits Hit Record-Smashing Highs in 2020
Auto Insurance Company Profits Hit Record-Smashing Highs in 2020
June 7, 2021
Independent Medical Examination: Why They're No Laughing Matter
Independent Medical Examination (IME): Why They Are No Laughing Matter
April 15, 2020