Have you been injured? you may have a case.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
GET A FREE CONSULTATION

Lawyers react to Michigan’s new auto law, McCormick v. Carrier

August 6, 2010 by Steven M. Gursten

Michigan Lawyers Weekly interviews top personal injury attorneys – as well as insurance defense – about the effect the Supreme Court decision will have on auto accident victims and No-Fault litigation

Steve Gursten, partner of Michigan Auto Law and one of the country’s most renowned personal injury attorneys, tells Michigan Lawyers Weekly that McCormick v. Carrier is a modest case, that simply returns Michigan’s auto law back to a definition that a Republican Legislature originally enacted. Meanwhile, insurance defense lawyers claim McCormick will raise auto insurance rates.

McCormick v. Carrier is an August 2010 ruling that eases the injury threshold for auto accident victims seeking pain and suffering lawsuits.

Take a look at the full story in Michigan Lawyers Weekly: Reaction to the ‘McCormick’ decision

 

Related information:

Michigan No-Fault Act

McCormick v. Carrier and its effect on Michigan auto law requirements

[Community Guidelines]

Need more information?
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Related Posts
Attorney Steve Gursten chairs AAJ’s ‘Best of the Best’ TBI Seminar
March 25, 2019
Steve Gursten talks to Fox 2 Detroit about CO Poisoning lawsuit
Steve Gursten talks to Fox 2 Detroit about CO Poisoning at Hickory Hollow
February 11, 2019
Michigan Auto Law’s 2018 Year in Review
December 26, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share
Pin
Email