Have you been injured? you may have a case. GET A FREE CONSULTATION

Lawyers react to Michigan’s new auto law, McCormick v. Carrier

August 6, 2010 by Steven M. Gursten

Michigan Lawyers Weekly interviews top personal injury attorneys – as well as insurance defense – about the effect the Supreme Court decision will have on auto accident victims and No-Fault litigation

Steve Gursten, partner of Michigan Auto Law and one of the country’s most renowned personal injury attorneys, tells Michigan Lawyers Weekly that McCormick v. Carrier is a modest case, that simply returns Michigan’s auto law back to a definition that a Republican Legislature originally enacted. Meanwhile, insurance defense lawyers claim McCormick will raise auto insurance rates.

McCormick v. Carrier is an August 2010 ruling that eases the injury threshold for auto accident victims seeking pain and suffering lawsuits.

Take a look at the full story in Michigan Lawyers Weekly: Reaction to the ‘McCormick’ decision

 

Related information:

Michigan No-Fault Act

McCormick v. Carrier and its effect on Michigan auto law requirements

[Community Guidelines]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Michigan Auto Insurance Reform Savings Debunked
April 29, 2020
Michigan Auto Law Car Accident Injury Survivor Scholarship 2020 winner announced
Michigan Auto Law Car Accident Injury Survivor Scholarship 2020 winner announced
April 24, 2020
Car Accident Settlement Stories | Michigan Auto Law
Car Accident Settlement Stories: Client Successes & Settlement Amounts
February 25, 2020
Our Recommended Car Insurance Coverages For The New No-Fault Law – Read More Here
Share
Tweet
Share
Pin
Email