Have you been injured? you may have a case. GET A FREE CONSULTATION

McCormick v. Carrier opens way for more fair auto injury suits in Michigan

August 2, 2010 by Steven M. Gursten

Toledo Blade: Auto accident lawyer explains the implications of Michigan Supreme Court ruling on car accident victims and their pain and suffering cases

The Toledo Blade interviews Steven Gursten – one of the country’s top auto accident lawyers – on McCormick v. CarrierMcCormick is an August 2010 Michigan Supreme Court decision that overturned Michigan’s previous auto law, Kreiner v. Fischer, which made it virtually impossible for crash victims to collect pain and suffering damages for serious injuries.

Gursten noted that while McCormick will make it easier for plaintiffs to garner awards for pain and suffering, the exact level has not been determined. The court determined it will be on a “case by case basis,” he said, and the definition will narrow as cases are decided.

Take a look at the full story in the Toledo Blade: Decision opens way for more car-injury suits in Michigan

 

Related information:

Third-party insurance – pain and suffering damages

McCormick v. Carrier blogs

[Community Guidelines]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Michigan Auto Insurance Reform Savings Debunked
April 29, 2020
Michigan Auto Law Car Accident Injury Survivor Scholarship 2020 winner announced
Michigan Auto Law Car Accident Injury Survivor Scholarship 2020 winner announced
April 24, 2020
Car Accident Settlement Stories | Michigan Auto Law
Car Accident Settlement Stories: Client Successes & Settlement Amounts
February 25, 2020
Our Recommended Car Insurance Coverages For The New No-Fault Law – Read More Here
Share
Tweet
Share
Pin
Email