Have you been injured? you may have a case. GET A FREE CONSULTATION

Hope on the Horizon for Traumatic Brain Injury Accident Victims

July 22, 2010 by Steven M. Gursten

Michigan traumatic brain injury lawyer discusses the promise of blood biomarkers for TBI victims

I read an article in Tuesday’s Wall Street Journal that promises hope to traumatic brain injury victims and survivors and the TBI lawyers who help them in America’s courtrooms.

The article is a must read for any lawyer who represents people who have suffered traumatic brain injury. What makes the article notable is that it discusses how serious traumatic brain injuries can be, how difficult TBI is to diagnose, how emergency rooms and doctors often miss many of the subtle symptoms of TBI, and how this delay in diagnosis leads both to improper treatment and sometimes catastrophic consequences for accident victims who have suffered serious closed-head injuries.

What makes the article most interesting is that it then goes on to discuss how researchers today are now close to identifying “biomarkers” that may soon make it possible to pinpoint brain injuries with a simple blood test that can be administered in hospitals after a car accident.

For traumatic brain injury lawyers used to dealing with scorched earth defenses and victim blaming in such personal injury cases, biomarkers that could identify TBI soon after an auto accident would be as close to a game changer as we could get. It promises hope and finally, better medical treatment and legal settlements that fairly compensate injury victims.

How could the world change with biomarker blood tests?

We’ve all heard that in America’s courtrooms, it isn’t what’s true that matters, it’s what a jury believes is true. And sadly, this is what makes representing traumatic brain injury accident victims so difficult. It’s also why so many personal injury lawyers won’t even take on clients with TBI cases.

These cases are so challenging because so much of what we might ordinarily believe is wrong when it comes to TBI cases. In most cases, there is no loss of consciousness. The MRIs and CT scans of the brain are often normal (even expected to be normal in cases of mild to moderate TBI). Hospital emergency rooms, EMTs and family doctors often miss diagnosing them, resulting in months of delayed treatment.

This delay in treatment raises suspicion in the minds of many. Insurance company defense lawyers often play upon this suspicion by arguing that if these injuries were really serious, they would have been diagnosed far earlier. And since these cases are expert-intensive, they are expensive. Now, assuming a brain injury attorney does everything right and spends the money to bring in the experts to separate the truths from the misconceptions, there is still the jury.

What makes these cases truly so difficult is that at the very end, many people have a psychological need to believe that these terrible, life-altering changes can’t just happen from a simple auto accident or bump on the head. The psychological principle at play is called defensive attribution, and it manifests itself in jurors trying to convince themselves to overlook the evidence and testimony, because if the world really is that scary, it means their own children are at risk and this is too troubling to believe. Defensive attribution causes many jurors to have a need to reject clear and convincing evidence of brain injury in courtrooms across the country.

This Wall Street Journal article addresses so many of these misconceptions, from how often traumatic brain injury is not diagnosed to how often medical doctors miss the subtle symptoms. And if indeed science is close to creating biomarkers that can, through a simple blood test, provide early detection of TBI for accident victims, then this new medical development can change everything.

Take a look at the full Wall Street Journal article, New Test for Brain Injury on Horizon.

Steven M. Gursten received a trial verdict of $5.65 million for a TBI victim in 2008; the largest reported auto negligence verdict in Michigan for the year. He frequently speaks on traumatic brain injury for lawyers across the country. Steve is a member of the American Association for Justice Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group and several foundations devoted to helping brain injury victims, including the Brain Injury Association of Michigan and the Sara Jane Brain Project.

Photo courtesy of Creative Commons, by Abhishek Jacob

Related information:

Michigan traumatic brain injury law

Documenting TBI for the jury

Steps TBI victims must take after a car accident

Michigan Auto Law is the largest law firm exclusively handling car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state. We have offices in Farmington Hills, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. Call (248) 353-7575 for a free consultation with an attorney – anytime.

[Community Guidelines]

One Reply to “Hope on the Horizon for Traumatic Brain Injury Accident Victims”

  1. I suffered a TBI on June 20, 1996, and was basically unaware that I was still majorly affected by it until recently. I called a lawyer earlier this week after my call wasn’t returned last week. I look normal, and I even finished college with a 3.6 GPA. But, I’m not able to get a job now along with the rest of the U.S. who are unemployed. In the past 14 years, I have had 23 jobs in which only 5 years and 4 months were spent working. I suffer from depression on a daily basis, and the fact that there are creditors calling me over 8 times a day doesn’t help. The only reason (aside from spiritual reasons) I haven’t killed myself is because my husband wouldn’t get the life insurance money if I commit suicide. I’m not a violent person, but I would like to just hit some people up the head with a bat to see how they feel towards the world then. I tried to get help from the state vocational rehab, but they haven’t gotten their monies yet to send me to a doctor/neurologist. I read some of a book on what to do after a traumatic brain injury written from a lawyer’s point-of-view. Everything written in it of what not to do is exactly what my family did after my accident. My bills totaled over $120,000 and I got $8,600. I didn’t want to sign the papers at the lawyer’s office to get the money because I saw that he was getting as much as me, but I was told that I was lucky I was getting anything. I was lucky because my father’s insurance could have taken all of the $25,000 from the policy in the case. Everytime I think of the money won in the case, I feel pretty shitty that that is all my life is worth. I don’t want to sue anybody, but I do want help in going to the doctor and getting a job that allows me to help in paying our bills so that we get out of debt. Do I have any rights, or am I basically screwed every which way I turn?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Brain Injury After A Car Accident: What You Need To Know
Brain Injury After A Car Accident: What You Need To Know
July 20, 2021
Brain Bleed From Car Accident: What You Need To Know
Brain Bleed From Car Accident: What You Need To Know
September 17, 2020
Hematoma After Car Accident: Should I Be Worried?
Hematoma After Car Accident: Should I Be Worried?
August 19, 2020