Have you been injured? you may have a case.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
GET A FREE CONSULTATION

Michigan Court of Appeals ruling protects dishonest insurer instead of child with traumatic brain injury

June 17, 2009 by Steven M. Gursten

Steven M. Gursten editorializes in The Oakland Press why Johnson v. Wausau enables your auto insurance company to legally lie to you about No-Fault benefits, such as attendant care

Who is the Michigan Court of Appeals protecting? A dishonest auto insurance company, or a baby with traumatic brain injury? No-fault insurance attorney Steve Gursten discusses a Michigan Court of Appeals ruling which denied the caregiver of a baby (who was seriously injured in a car accident) attendant care benefits, even though her insurance company lied to her by insisting there were no more No-Fault benefits available.

The Court’s reasoning is that any accident victim should check out the accuracy of anything and everything an insurance claims adjuster says by consulting with a lawyer.

Here’s the editorial in The Oakland Press: Ruling protects auto insurer instead of child with brain injury

 

Related information:

Why your insurance company can now lie to you and get away with it

Your Michigan No-Fault benefits

[Community Guidelines]

Need more information?
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Related Posts
Attorney Steve Gursten chairs AAJ’s ‘Best of the Best’ TBI Seminar
March 25, 2019
Child Brain Injury Lawyer - Lingering effects of TBI in children
Child brain injury lawyer: How injury symptoms in children linger after a concussion, TBI
March 18, 2019
March is TBI Awareness month
March 11, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share
Pin
Email