Have you been injured? you may have a case. GET A FREE CONSULTATION

Michigan Court of Appeals ruling protects dishonest insurer instead of child with traumatic brain injury

June 17, 2009 by Steven M. Gursten

Steven M. Gursten editorializes in The Oakland Press why Johnson v. Wausau enables your auto insurance company to legally lie to you about No-Fault benefits, such as attendant care

Who is the Michigan Court of Appeals protecting? A dishonest auto insurance company, or a baby with traumatic brain injury? No-fault insurance attorney Steve Gursten discusses a Michigan Court of Appeals ruling which denied the caregiver of a baby (who was seriously injured in a car accident) attendant care benefits, even though her insurance company lied to her by insisting there were no more No-Fault benefits available.

The Court’s reasoning is that any accident victim should check out the accuracy of anything and everything an insurance claims adjuster says by consulting with a lawyer.

Here’s the editorial in The Oakland Press: Ruling protects auto insurer instead of child with brain injury

 

Related information:

Why your insurance company can now lie to you and get away with it

Your Michigan No-Fault benefits

[Community Guidelines]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Michigan Auto Insurance Reform Savings Debunked
April 29, 2020
Michigan Auto Law Car Accident Injury Survivor Scholarship 2020 winner announced
Michigan Auto Law Car Accident Injury Survivor Scholarship 2020 winner announced
April 24, 2020
Car Accident Settlement Stories | Michigan Auto Law
Car Accident Settlement Stories: Client Successes & Settlement Amounts
February 25, 2020
Our Recommended Car Insurance Coverages For The New No-Fault Law – Read More Here
Share
Tweet
Share
Pin
Email