Have you been injured? you may have a case. GET A FREE CONSULTATION

Why Johnson v. Wausau encourages insurance adjusters in Michigan to lie about No-Fault benefits

April 9, 2009 by Steven M. Gursten

Auto lawyer Steve Gursten writes a rebuttal opinion editorial in the Detroit Legal News about a Michigan Court of Appeals case that denied attendant care benefits to a child with traumatic brain injury

Who’s the Michigan Court of Appeals protecting? A dishonest auto insurance company, or a baby with traumatic brain injury? Auto attorney Steve Gursten discusses a Michigan Court of Appeals ruling which denied a child who was seriously injured in a car accident attendant care benefits, even though her insurance company lied to her caregiver by insisting there were no more No-Fault benefits available.

The Court’s reasoning was that any accident victim should check out the accuracy of everything an insurance claims adjuster says by consulting with an attorney. Now Gursten responds to a lawyer who disagrees with his first editorial, Decision allows No-Fault insurers to get away with lying.

Take a look at the opinion piece in the Detroit Legal News: Why Johnson v. Wausau encourages insurance adjusters in Michigan to lie

Related information:

Why your insurance company can now lie to you and get away with it

Auto attorney video: Attendant care

[Community Guidelines]

Related Posts
Super Lawyers 2019 & Best Lawyers in America 2020 Lists Revealed
Michigan Auto Law attorneys selected for the Super Lawyers 2019 and Best Lawyers in America 2020© listings
September 4, 2019
Helen Zhou Wins Michigan Auto Law’s 2019 Law Student Diversity Scholarship
Recipient announced for the Michigan Auto Law 2019 Law Student Diversity Scholarship
August 22, 2019
Attorney Steve Gursten To Lead Two National Legal Groups
Attorney Steven Gursten to Lead Two Legal Groups: The Melvin M. Belli Society & AAJ Distracted Driving Litigation Group
August 12, 2019
Michigan has a new auto No-Fault law. Click Here to learn more.