Have you been injured? you may have a case.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
GET A FREE CONSULTATION

Michigan No-Fault lawyer on “Post-Kreiner makeover”

October 9, 2006 by Steven M. Gursten

New objectively manifested standard – car accident impairment must be visually apparent

Steven M. Gursten is interviewed by Michigan Lawyers Weekly on the standard for determining whether an impairment from an auto accident is “objectively manifested” for purposes of the no-fault act’s “serious impairment of body function” threshold. Steve says the definition for objective manifestation in Netter v. Bowman is very favorable to the plaintiffs bar. This is because it will allow a plaintiff whose injuries would otherwise defy detection or proof by objective testing to satisfy the objective manifestation requirement so long as a doctor can give a medical explanation for what is causing the condition.

[Community Guidelines]

Need more information?
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Related Posts
Steve Gursten talks to Fox 2 Detroit about CO Poisoning lawsuit
Steve Gursten talks to Fox 2 Detroit about CO Poisoning at Hickory Hollow
February 11, 2019
Michigan Auto Law’s 2018 Year in Review
December 26, 2018
Hewitt tells WZZM about FREE drivers license reinstatement
December 3, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share
Pin
Email