Have you been injured? you may have a case. GET A FREE CONSULTATION

Auto accident lawyer on Michigan Supreme Court case Kreiner v. Fischer

September 12, 2005 by Steven M. Gursten

Michigan Lawyers Weekly says Kreiner v. Fischer produces few wins for plaintiff auto accident victims, even fewer published car accident cases

Auto accident lawyer Steven M. Gursten is interviewed by Michigan Lawyers Weekly on the binding precedent in the post-Kreiner v. Fischer era. Gursten says courts have missed the mark on the physician-imposed restrictions issue: “The Michigan Supreme Court has imposed a requirement that is not based upon how real, day-to-day medicine is practiced. It has created am unrealistic fantasy world, which tells doctors they have to sit down and write up a list of restrictions for car accident injury victims.”

Here’s the Michigan Lawyers Weekly story: Kreiner v. Fischer produces few wins for auto accident victims, even fewer published decisions

 

Update: The Michigan Supreme Court ruled on McCormick v. Carrier on August 1, 2010. This overturned Kreiner v. Fischer and restored the rights of auto accident victims in Michigan. 

Related information:

McCormick v. Carrier and its effect on Michigan auto law requirements

Kreiner v. Fischer blogs

[Community Guidelines]

Related Posts
Attorney Kevin Seiferheld speaks on Advanced Trial Advocacy at Michigan Association for Justice seminar
May 17, 2019
Attorney Brandon Hewitt talks about distracted driving with WZZM 13 Grand Rapids
May 13, 2019
Michigan Car Insurance Rates: Attorney Brandon Hewitt Talks About The Non-Driving Factors Affecting Them
May 10, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share
Pin
Email