Michigan Lawyers Weekly interviews injury lawyer Steven Gursten onĀ why the Michigan Supreme Court spared its car accident ruling In two recent orders, the Michigan Supreme Court has declined the opportunity to reconsider Michigan’s auto law, McCormick v. Carrier. Therefore, … Continue reading
Injury lawyer Steve Gursten tells Crain’s Detroit Business – NO. Steve Gursten, injury lawyer and head of Michigan Auto Law, is featured in Crain’s Detroit Business on No-Fault insurance rates in relation to the state’s new auto law, McCormick v. … Continue reading
Michigan Lawyers Weekly interviews top personal injury attorneys – as well as insurance defense – about the effect the Supreme Court decision will have on auto accident victims and No-Fault litigation Steve Gursten, partner of Michigan Auto Law and one … Continue reading
Personal injury attorney Steve Gursten tells the Lansing State Journal that auto insurance rates should not rise following the landmark Michigan Supreme Court decision McCormick v. Carrier is an August 2010 Michigan Supreme Court case that eases the injury threshold … Continue reading
Car accident lawyer Steve Gursten tells newspaper that new auto law will let crash victims collect more fairly for pain and suffering lawsuits The Detroit News features car accident lawyer Steve Gursten on McCormick v. Carrier, an Aug. 1, 2010 … Continue reading
Auto accident lawyer says under McCormick v. Carrier, personal injuries now do not have to be life-long in order to bring pain and suffering lawsuits MLive.com interviews Steve Gursten, one of the counry’s top auto accident lawyers, on McCormick v. … Continue reading
Steven M. Gursten editorializes in The Oakland Press why Johnson v. Wausau enables your auto insurance company to legally lie to you about No-Fault benefits, such as attendant care Who is the Michigan Court of Appeals protecting? A dishonest auto … Continue reading
Steve Gursten opines on car accident case where child with traumatic brain injury was deliberately denied the attendant care benefits she was entitled to by her auto insurance company Johnson v. Wausau Insurance Co. is a Michigan Court of Appeals … Continue reading