Car Accident Attorney Dave Christensen Wins Ann Arbor Trial
May 21st, 2010Michigan Auto Law partner gets insurance policy limits and medical benefits for auto accident victim with head, neck and back injuries
I’d like to congratulate my fellow partner David E. Christensen for yet another trial win. Dave’s Washtenaw County car accident case was against our client’s insurance company, USAA, as well as the at-fault driver.
The accident occurred on Ecorse Road in Ypsilanti, when the at-fault driver pulled out from a side-street and crashed into our client. Our client sustained serious personal injuries including herniated discs in his neck and lower back that both required surgery, and a closed-head injury.
Dave prevailed on the issue at hand, causation, meaning whether the plaintiff’s injuries were caused by the car accident. Since the jury agreed the car accident did cause the personal injuries, USAA was ordered to pay what they were legally required to pay in the first place – the total of the plaintiff’s policy limits and all of his No-Fault benefits.
USAA was our client’s insurer, and was legally responsible for paying our client’s No-Fault benefits, including his accident related medical bills. But — as many insurance companies do following a car accident — USAA terminated his benefits prematurely, refusing to pay for two surgeries to his neck and back as well as for his closed-head injury treatment. USAA based their refusal on insurance doctor (also called “independent” medical examiner or IME) reports.
The at-fault driver only had $25,000 in auto insurance coverage, but our client’s damages greatly exceeded that amount. Fortunately, our client had purchased underinsured motorist coverage (UIM) from USAA. UIM provides extra insurance when the other driver doesn’t have enough insurance to fully compensate you in the event of a crash. But in this case, the underinsured motorist coverage did not protect our client. Again, USAA refused to pay those benefits, forcing their own customer to sue them.
Unfortunately, what this insurance company did to Dave’s client is a common practice. Car accident victims are routinely “cut off” by their own insurance companies following IME appointments, where the medical examiner claims the plaintiff is not seriously injured after a 10-minute examination.
Dave has not only garnered many multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements for his clients who’ve been injured in auto accidents, but he routinely goes to bat for people who continue to be taken advantage of by their insurance companies, like in this case.
Hopefully trials like this will help send the message to insurance companies that delaying, defending and denying benefits for No-Fault insurance that Michigan residents are legally required to purchase is unethical and must stop.
Great job, Dave.
- Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious car accident and truck accident injury cases and automobile insurance no-fault litigation. Michigan Auto Law has received the largest reported jury verdict for an automobile accident case in Michigan in seven of the past 10 years, including 2009, according to published year-end verdicts and settlements reports.
Related information:
Dealing with Auto Insurance Companies
Michigan Auto Law Verdicts and Settlements
Car Insurance Claims Adjuster Tactics
Michigan Auto Law is the largest law firm exclusively handling car accident, truck accident, motorcycle accident and bus cases throughout the state. Call (800) 777-0028 if you’ve been injured in an auto accident, and would like to speak to a lawyer.




















May 24th, 2010 at 8:27 pm
Good Job Dave! Standing up to the insurance companies arrogance is much needed these days!
September 11th, 2010 at 5:24 pm
What if you did not know the other at fault driver had no insurance. ,if the police report states that there was? It forces a person to contact an attorney even if they don’t want to. This happened to me after an injury accident where the police took all of the information. They also messpelled the driver’s name and address. By the time I realized my injuries were not improving, but worsening, I contacted an attorney. It took almost a year to sort out the correct name (private investigator, could not locate driver, no answer back from insurance broker, etc). By that time my insurance company said they would not pay an uninsured motorist claim because it was past the statute of limitations. Shouldn’t the claims adjuster have checked it out when I filed the claim? How many people are out there with fake insurance papers and how can we protect ourselves?